UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE
EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA
(PHILADELPHIA)
Strick Corporation,
plaintiff
v.
James B. Strickland,
defendant
Civil action no. 00-CV-3343
JUDGE BRUCE W. KAUFFMAN
PROPOSED ORDER
It is hereby Ordered as follows:
Summary Judgment is granted in favor of defendant James Strickland on Count I - false designation of origin.
Summary Judgment is granted in favor of defendant James Strickland on Count II - Federal Dilution.
Summary Judgment is granted in favor of defendant James Strickland on Count III - Trademark Infringement.
Summary Judgment is granted in favor of defendant James Strickland on Count IV - Cybersquatting.
Summary Judgment is granted in favor of defendant James Strickland on Count V - State law infringement and dilution.
Summary Judgment is granted in favor of defendant James Strickland on Count VI - Unfair competition.
Summary Judgment is granted in favor of defendant James Strickland on Count VII - Common-law trademark infringement.
Summary Judgment is granted in favor of defendant James Strickland on Count VIII - Unjust enrichment.
The court hereby rules in limine that the letter dated April 15, 1996 from James Strickland to attorney Leonard Barkan is inadmissable under Rule 408 of the Federal Rules of Evidence.
___________________
USDJ