UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE

EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA

(PHILADELPHIA)

Strick Corporation,

plaintiff

v.

James B. Strickland,

defendant

Civil action no. 00-CV-3343

JUDGE BRUCE W. KAUFFMAN

PROPOSED ORDER

It is hereby Ordered as follows:

Summary Judgment is granted in favor of defendant James Strickland on Count I - false designation of origin.

Summary Judgment is granted in favor of defendant James Strickland on Count II - Federal Dilution.

Summary Judgment is granted in favor of defendant James Strickland on Count III - Trademark Infringement.

Summary Judgment is granted in favor of defendant James Strickland on Count IV - Cybersquatting.

Summary Judgment is granted in favor of defendant James Strickland on Count V - State law infringement and dilution.

Summary Judgment is granted in favor of defendant James Strickland on Count VI - Unfair competition.

Summary Judgment is granted in favor of defendant James Strickland on Count VII - Common-law trademark infringement.

Summary Judgment is granted in favor of defendant James Strickland on Count VIII - Unjust enrichment.

The court hereby rules in limine that the letter dated April 15, 1996 from James Strickland to attorney Leonard Barkan is inadmissable under Rule 408 of the Federal Rules of Evidence.

___________________

USDJ